Match Analysis
Monday 20 July 2026 · AI-driven form analysis
Serie A
leagueEcuador
Guayaquil City
Home
Manta
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Guayaquil City show the better attacking return at 1.7 goals per game compared with Manta at 0.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Guayaquil City
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Manta
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Guayaquil City
Home
Manta
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Guayaquil City attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Guayaquil City defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Manta attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Manta defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Guayaquil City hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 68/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
68/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 68/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Guayaquil City strong attack
Guayaquil City stable defense
Guayaquil City non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 18
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Independiente del Valle
Home
Emelec
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Independiente del Valle average 5.0 goals scored and concede 0.5 per game. Emelec average 1.3 scored and 2.3 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Independiente del Valle
At home, they average 5.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Emelec
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Independiente del Valle
Home
Emelec
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Independiente del Valle attack is strong at 5.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Independiente del Valle defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Emelec attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Emelec defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Independiente del Valle hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Independiente del Valle have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Independiente del Valle to Win — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
WinNo team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
91/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Independiente del Valle strong attack
Independiente del Valle stable defense
Independiente del Valle non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Independiente del Valle have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Mushuc Runa
Home
Orense
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Mushuc Runa
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Orense
Away from home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Mushuc Runa
Home
Orense
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Mushuc Runa attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Mushuc Runa defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Orense attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Orense defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 68/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
68/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 68/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Mushuc Runa attack stays below 100%
Orense attack stays below 100%
Mushuc Runa Over 2.5 rate limit
Orense Over 2.5 rate limit
Mushuc Runa recent scoring is not high volume
Orense recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 26
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 36
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 42
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Other
USA
Connecticut United
Home
New York Red Bulls II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output and consistent scoring trends. This creates a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Connecticut United
At home, they average 2.60 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II
Away from home, they average 2.60 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Connecticut United
Home
New York Red Bulls II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Connecticut United attack is strong at 2.60 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Connecticut United defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II attack is strong at 2.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
New York Red Bulls II defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 92/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Connecticut United attack strength 100%
New York Red Bulls II attack strength 100%
Connecticut United scoring form 100%
New York Red Bulls II scoring form 80%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 100%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
New York Red Bulls II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Boston Legacy FC
Home
Washington Spirit
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.7 (home) and 1.3 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Boston Legacy FC
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Washington Spirit
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Boston Legacy FC
Home
Washington Spirit
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Boston Legacy FC attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Boston Legacy FC defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Washington Spirit attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Washington Spirit defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Washington Spirit have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.67 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 68/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
68/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 68/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Boston Legacy FC scoring form 100%
Washington Spirit scoring form 67%
Boston Legacy FC attack strength 84%
Washington Spirit attack strength 67%
Neither team attack < 70%
Boston Legacy FC defense control
Washington Spirit defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 50%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 23
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sporting Kansas City II
Home
Minnesota United II
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sporting Kansas City II show the better attacking return at 1.8 goals per game compared with Minnesota United II at 1.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Sporting Kansas City II
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Minnesota United II
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sporting Kansas City II
Home
Minnesota United II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sporting Kansas City II attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Sporting Kansas City II defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Minnesota United II attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Minnesota United II defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sporting Kansas City II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 71/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Sporting Kansas City II strong attack
Sporting Kansas City II scored in last 5
Minnesota United II concessions at weak rate
Minnesota United II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Blooming
Home
Real Tomayapo
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Blooming
At home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Real Tomayapo
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Blooming
Home
Real Tomayapo
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Blooming attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Blooming defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Real Tomayapo attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Real Tomayapo defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Blooming have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Blooming attack stays below 100%
Real Tomayapo attack stays below 100%
Blooming Over 2.5 rate limit
Real Tomayapo Over 2.5 rate limit
Blooming recent scoring is not high volume
Real Tomayapo recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 16
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Ballard FC
Home
Colorado Storm
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output and consistent scoring trends. This creates a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Ballard FC
At home, they average 4.00 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Colorado Storm
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC
Home
Colorado Storm
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ballard FC attack is strong at 4.00 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Ballard FC defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Colorado Storm attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Colorado Storm defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 70% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Ballard FC attack strength 100%
Colorado Storm attack strength 100%
Ballard FC scoring form 100%
Colorado Storm scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 80%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Ballard FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 53
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Real Monarchs SLC
Home
Tacoma Defiance
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 1.6 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Real Monarchs SLC
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Tacoma Defiance
Away from home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Real Monarchs SLC
Home
Tacoma Defiance
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Real Monarchs SLC attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Real Monarchs SLC defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Tacoma Defiance attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Tacoma Defiance defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Tacoma Defiance have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 65% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 69/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Real Monarchs SLC scoring form 80%
Tacoma Defiance scoring form 80%
Real Monarchs SLC attack strength 70%
Tacoma Defiance attack strength 80%
Neither team attack < 70%
Real Monarchs SLC defense control
Tacoma Defiance defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 60%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FK Jelgava
Home
RFS
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.0 (home) and 2.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
FK Jelgava
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
RFS
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
FK Jelgava
Home
RFS
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FK Jelgava attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
FK Jelgava defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
RFS attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
RFS defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
RFS have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.5 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 63% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
77/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 77/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FK Jelgava attack strength 100%
RFS attack strength 100%
FK Jelgava scoring form 67%
RFS scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 42%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
RFS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 44
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
KPV
Home
RoPS
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
RoPS have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while KPV concede 2.6 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
KPV
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
RoPS
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
KPV
Home
RoPS
Away
Supporting Reasoning
KPV attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
KPV defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
RoPS attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
RoPS defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
RoPS hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
RoPS have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
RoPS strong attack
RoPS stable defense
RoPS non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
RoPS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Suduva
Home
Hegelmann Litauen
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Suduva average 1.2 goals scored and concede 0.6 per game. Hegelmann Litauen average 0.6 scored and 1.6 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Suduva
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Hegelmann Litauen
Away from home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Suduva
Home
Hegelmann Litauen
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Suduva attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Suduva defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Hegelmann Litauen attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Hegelmann Litauen defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Suduva hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Suduva have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Suduva strong attack
Suduva stable defense
Suduva non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Pirata FC
Home
Universidad San Martin
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.3 (home) and 2.3 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Pirata FC
At home, they average 2.33 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Universidad San Martin
Away from home, they average 2.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Pirata FC
Home
Universidad San Martin
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Pirata FC attack is strong at 2.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Pirata FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Universidad San Martin attack is strong at 2.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Universidad San Martin defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.67 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 87% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Pirata FC attack strength 100%
Universidad San Martin attack strength 100%
Pirata FC scoring form 100%
Universidad San Martin scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 83%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Universidad San Martin have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
SK Super Nova
Home
Grobina
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
SK Super Nova
At home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Grobina
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
SK Super Nova
Home
Grobina
Away
Supporting Reasoning
SK Super Nova attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
SK Super Nova defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Grobina attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Grobina defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
SK Super Nova hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Grobina have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
SK Super Nova attack stays below 100%
Grobina attack stays below 100%
SK Super Nova Over 2.5 rate limit
Grobina Over 2.5 rate limit
SK Super Nova recent scoring is not high volume
Grobina recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 24
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 31
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 44
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Norrby
Home
GIF Sundsvall
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Weak attacking output from both sides — neither team averages more than 1.2 goals per game. Limited goal threat across the board.
Norrby
At home, they average 0.40 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
GIF Sundsvall
Away from home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Norrby
Home
GIF Sundsvall
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Norrby attack is weak at 0.40 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Norrby defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
GIF Sundsvall attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
GIF Sundsvall defense is weak at 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Norrby have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Weak attacking teams are unpredictable — form can suddenly improve or the sample window may be small.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Norrby attack stays below 100%
GIF Sundsvall attack stays below 100%
Norrby Over 2.5 rate limit
GIF Sundsvall Over 2.5 rate limit
Norrby recent scoring is not high volume
GIF Sundsvall recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 20
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 29
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 39
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
San Antonio Bulo Bulo
Home
ABB
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
San Antonio Bulo Bulo
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
ABB
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
San Antonio Bulo Bulo
Home
ABB
Away
Supporting Reasoning
San Antonio Bulo Bulo attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
San Antonio Bulo Bulo defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
ABB attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
ABB defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 73/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
73/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 68/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 73/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
San Antonio Bulo Bulo scoring form 67%
ABB scoring form 100%
San Antonio Bulo Bulo attack strength 50%
ABB attack strength 50%
Neither team attack < 70%
San Antonio Bulo Bulo defense control
ABB defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 32
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sporting CP
Home
Strasbourg
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sporting CP have the clearer attacking edge at 3.4 goals per game, while Strasbourg concede 1.8 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Sporting CP
At home, they average 3.40 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Strasbourg
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Sporting CP
Home
Strasbourg
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sporting CP attack is strong at 3.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Sporting CP defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Strasbourg attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Strasbourg defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Sporting CP hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Sporting CP have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sporting CP have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Sporting CP have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sporting CP have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Sporting CP strong attack
Sporting CP scored in last 5
Strasbourg concessions at weak rate
Strasbourg conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
HK Kopavogs
Home
Vestri
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
HK Kopavogs have the clearer attacking edge at 2.8 goals per game, while Vestri concede 2.4 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
HK Kopavogs
At home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Vestri
Away from home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per game.
HK Kopavogs
Home
Vestri
Away
Supporting Reasoning
HK Kopavogs attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
HK Kopavogs defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Vestri attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Vestri defense is weak at 2.40 goals conceded per game.
HK Kopavogs hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. HK Kopavogs have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5HK Kopavogs have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 82/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. HK Kopavogs have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
HK Kopavogs strong attack
HK Kopavogs scored in last 5
Vestri concessions at weak rate
Vestri conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Keflavik
Home
IA Akranes
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 1.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Keflavik
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
IA Akranes
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Keflavik
Home
IA Akranes
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Keflavik attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Keflavik defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
IA Akranes attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
IA Akranes defense is weak at 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 83% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 67/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Keflavik scoring form 100%
IA Akranes scoring form 80%
Keflavik attack strength 70%
IA Akranes attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
Keflavik defense control
IA Akranes defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 80%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FH Hafnarfjordur
Home
Breidablik
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.6 (home) and 2.2 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
FH Hafnarfjordur
At home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Breidablik
Away from home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
FH Hafnarfjordur
Home
Breidablik
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FH Hafnarfjordur attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
FH Hafnarfjordur defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Breidablik attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Breidablik defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Breidablik hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 85% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Breidablik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Breidablik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Breidablik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Breidablik strong attack
Breidablik scored in last 5
FH Hafnarfjordur concessions at weak rate
FH Hafnarfjordur conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Tacuary
Home
Deportivo Capiata
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Tacuary average 3.0 goals scored and concede 2.0 per game. Deportivo Capiata average 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Tacuary
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Deportivo Capiata
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Tacuary
Home
Deportivo Capiata
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Tacuary attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Tacuary defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Deportivo Capiata attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Deportivo Capiata defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Tacuary hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Deportivo Capiata have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
83/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Tacuary scoring form 100%
Deportivo Capiata scoring form 100%
Tacuary attack strength 100%
Deportivo Capiata attack strength 50%
Neither team attack < 70%
Tacuary defense control
Deportivo Capiata defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Tacuary have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 40
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Montevideo City Torque
Home
Danubio
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Montevideo City Torque average 2.0 goals scored and concede 4.0 per game. Danubio average 0.5 scored and 1.5 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Montevideo City Torque
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Danubio
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Montevideo City Torque
Home
Danubio
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Montevideo City Torque attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Montevideo City Torque defense is weak at 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Danubio attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Danubio defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Montevideo City Torque hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Danubio have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Montevideo City Torque have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Montevideo City Torque have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 75/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Montevideo City Torque have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Montevideo City Torque strong attack
Montevideo City Torque scored in last 5
Danubio concessions at weak rate
Danubio conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie D
cupBrazil
America RN
Home
Gama
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
America RN show the better attacking return at 2.2 goals per game compared with Gama at 1.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
America RN
At home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Gama
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
America RN
Home
Gama
Away
Supporting Reasoning
America RN attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
America RN defense is strong at 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Gama attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Gama defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
America RN hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. America RN show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
Over 1.5America RN show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. America RN show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
America RN strong attack
America RN stable defense
America RN non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
America RN have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 4
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Liga 1
leaguePeru
Alianza Lima
Home
Sport Huancayo
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Alianza Lima averages 2.0 goals per game while the opponent concedes 2.7 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Alianza Lima
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Sport Huancayo
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Alianza Lima
Home
Sport Huancayo
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Alianza Lima attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Alianza Lima defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Sport Huancayo attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Sport Huancayo defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Alianza Lima hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Alianza Lima have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Alianza Lima to Win — 91% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
WinNo team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
91/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Alianza Lima strong attack
Alianza Lima stable defense
Alianza Lima non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Alianza Lima have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Corvinul Hunedoara
Home
Miercurea Ciuc
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Corvinul Hunedoara show the better attacking return at 1.5 goals per game compared with Miercurea Ciuc at 0.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Corvinul Hunedoara
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Miercurea Ciuc
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Corvinul Hunedoara
Home
Miercurea Ciuc
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Corvinul Hunedoara attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Corvinul Hunedoara defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Miercurea Ciuc attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Miercurea Ciuc defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Corvinul Hunedoara hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 72% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Corvinul Hunedoara attack stays below 100%
Miercurea Ciuc attack stays below 100%
Corvinul Hunedoara Over 2.5 rate limit
Miercurea Ciuc Over 2.5 rate limit
Corvinul Hunedoara recent scoring is not high volume
Miercurea Ciuc recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 20
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 55
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Rapid 1923
Home
Sepsi OSK
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
FC Rapid 1923
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Sepsi OSK
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
FC Rapid 1923
Home
Sepsi OSK
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Rapid 1923 attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
FC Rapid 1923 defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Sepsi OSK attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Sepsi OSK defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Sepsi OSK hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
FC Rapid 1923 have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
65/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Rapid 1923 attack stays below 100%
Sepsi OSK attack stays below 100%
FC Rapid 1923 Over 2.5 rate limit
Sepsi OSK Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Rapid 1923 recent scoring is not high volume
Sepsi OSK recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Win <65
Below 65% by 19
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Club Friendlies
Club Friendlies
Eyupspor
Home
Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Eyupspor show the better attacking return at 2.4 goals per game compared with Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor at 0.4, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Eyupspor
At home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor
Away from home, they average 0.40 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Eyupspor
Home
Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Eyupspor attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Eyupspor defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor attack is weak at 0.40 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Mardin Buyuksehir Basakspor defense is strong at 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Eyupspor hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
82/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Eyupspor strong attack
Eyupspor stable defense
Eyupspor non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Eyupspor have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 20
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Wolfsberger AC
Home
Atus Velden
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Wolfsberger AC have the clearer attacking edge at 4.0 goals per game, while Atus Velden concede 3.6 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Wolfsberger AC
At home, they average 4.00 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Atus Velden
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.60 goals conceded per game.
Wolfsberger AC
Home
Atus Velden
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Wolfsberger AC attack is strong at 4.00 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Wolfsberger AC defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Atus Velden attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Atus Velden defense is weak at 3.60 goals conceded per game.
Wolfsberger AC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Wolfsberger AC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Wolfsberger AC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Wolfsberger AC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 82/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Wolfsberger AC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Wolfsberger AC strong attack
Wolfsberger AC scored in last 5
Atus Velden concessions at weak rate
Atus Velden conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Veikkausliiga
Finland
TPS
Home
Ilves
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.6 (home) and 1.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
TPS
At home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Ilves
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
TPS
Home
Ilves
Away
Supporting Reasoning
TPS attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
TPS defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Ilves attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Ilves defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 86% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 83/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
TPS scoring form 80%
Ilves scoring form 80%
TPS attack strength 80%
Ilves attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
TPS defense control
Ilves defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 70%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 47
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
IFK Mariehamn
Home
FC Lahti
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
IFK Mariehamn
At home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 3.20 goals conceded per game.
FC Lahti
Away from home, they average 0.80 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per game.
IFK Mariehamn
Home
FC Lahti
Away
Supporting Reasoning
IFK Mariehamn attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
IFK Mariehamn defense is weak at 3.20 goals conceded per game.
FC Lahti attack is weak at 0.80 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
FC Lahti defense is strong at 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
FC Lahti have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Win · 69/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
IFK Mariehamn attack stays below 100%
FC Lahti attack stays below 100%
IFK Mariehamn Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Lahti Over 2.5 rate limit
IFK Mariehamn recent scoring is not high volume
FC Lahti recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Parva Liga
leagueBulgaria
Slavia Sofia
Home
PFC CSKA Sofia
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Slavia Sofia
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
PFC CSKA Sofia
Away from home, they average 0.75 goals scored and 1.25 goals conceded per game.
Slavia Sofia
Home
PFC CSKA Sofia
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Slavia Sofia attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Slavia Sofia defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
PFC CSKA Sofia attack is weak at 0.75 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
PFC CSKA Sofia defense is average at 1.25 goals conceded per game.
Slavia Sofia hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Slavia Sofia attack stays below 100%
PFC CSKA Sofia attack stays below 100%
Slavia Sofia Over 2.5 rate limit
PFC CSKA Sofia Over 2.5 rate limit
Slavia Sofia recent scoring is not high volume
PFC CSKA Sofia recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 3
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 32
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Botev Plovdiv
Home
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Botev Plovdiv have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929 concede 2.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Botev Plovdiv
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Botev Plovdiv
Home
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Botev Plovdiv attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Botev Plovdiv defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929 attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929 defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Botev Plovdiv hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Botev Plovdiv have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 74/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 74/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Botev Plovdiv strong attack
Botev Plovdiv scored in last 5
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929 concessions at weak rate
PFC Lokomotiv Sofia 1929 conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Allsvenskan
Sweden
Oergryte
Home
Djurgaarden
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Djurgaarden have the clearer attacking edge at 2.2 goals per game, while Oergryte concede 2.8 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Oergryte
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Djurgaarden
Away from home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Oergryte
Home
Djurgaarden
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Oergryte attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Oergryte defense is weak at 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Djurgaarden attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Djurgaarden defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Djurgaarden hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 75% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Djurgaarden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Djurgaarden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 87/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Djurgaarden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Djurgaarden strong attack
Djurgaarden scored in last 5
Oergryte concessions at weak rate
Oergryte conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kalmar FF
Home
Malmo FF
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Malmo FF show the better attacking return at 2.8 goals per game compared with Kalmar FF at 1.4, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Kalmar FF
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Malmo FF
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Kalmar FF
Home
Malmo FF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Kalmar FF attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Kalmar FF defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Malmo FF attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Malmo FF defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Malmo FF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 71/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
71/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 71/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kalmar FF attack strength 70%
Malmo FF attack strength 100%
Kalmar FF scoring form 60%
Malmo FF scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 60%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Malmo FF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Legend