Match Analysis
Monday 22 June 2026 · AI-driven form analysis
Serie D
cupBrazil
Araguaina
Home
Nacional AM
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Araguaina average 3.8 goals scored and concede 1.0 per game. Nacional AM average 1.4 scored and 0.6 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Araguaina
At home, they average 3.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Nacional AM
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Araguaina
Home
Nacional AM
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Araguaina attack is strong at 3.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Araguaina defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Nacional AM attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Nacional AM defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Araguaina hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Nacional AM have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.6 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
85/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 71/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Araguaina scoring form 80%
Nacional AM scoring form 80%
Araguaina attack strength 100%
Nacional AM attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
Araguaina defense control
Nacional AM defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 40%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 10
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Independencia
Home
Manauara
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Independencia average 2.2 goals scored and concede 1.0 per game. Manauara average 0.8 scored and 0.2 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Independencia
At home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Manauara
Away from home, they average 0.80 goals scored and 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Independencia
Home
Manauara
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Independencia attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Independencia defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Manauara attack is weak at 0.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Manauara defense is strong at 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Independencia hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Manauara have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
82/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Independencia strong attack
Independencia stable defense
Independencia non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Sao Raimundo RR
Home
Porto Velho EC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sao Raimundo RR average 1.2 goals scored and concede 1.2 per game. Porto Velho EC average 4.4 scored and 0.8 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Sao Raimundo RR
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Porto Velho EC
Away from home, they average 4.40 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Sao Raimundo RR
Home
Porto Velho EC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sao Raimundo RR attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Sao Raimundo RR defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Porto Velho EC attack is strong at 4.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Porto Velho EC defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Porto Velho EC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Porto Velho EC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Porto Velho EC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Porto Velho EC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 92/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Porto Velho EC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Porto Velho EC strong attack
Porto Velho EC stable defense
Porto Velho EC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Porto Velho EC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 4
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie B
leagueBrazil
Goias
Home
Operario Ferroviario
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Goias average 0.5 goals scored and concede 2.0 per game. Operario Ferroviario average 1.5 scored and 1.5 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Goias
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Operario Ferroviario
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Goias
Home
Operario Ferroviario
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Goias attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Goias defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Operario Ferroviario attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Operario Ferroviario defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Operario Ferroviario hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Operario Ferroviario have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 72/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selection Score
72/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 65/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 72/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Operario Ferroviario strong attack
Operario Ferroviario scored in last 5
Goias concessions at weak rate
Goias conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie C
leagueBrazil
Ferroviaria
Home
Inter de Limeira
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Ferroviaria
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Inter de Limeira
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Ferroviaria
Home
Inter de Limeira
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ferroviaria attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Ferroviaria defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Inter de Limeira attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Inter de Limeira defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Inter de Limeira hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.67 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.5 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 72/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
72/100
Runner Up
Win · 67/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 72/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Ferroviaria scoring form 100%
Inter de Limeira scoring form 100%
Ferroviaria attack strength 50%
Inter de Limeira attack strength 75%
Neither team attack < 70%
Ferroviaria defense control
Inter de Limeira defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 42%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Other
cupChile
Universidad de Chile
Home
Santiago Wanderers
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 2.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Universidad de Chile
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Santiago Wanderers
Away from home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Universidad de Chile
Home
Santiago Wanderers
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Universidad de Chile attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Universidad de Chile defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Santiago Wanderers attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Santiago Wanderers defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Santiago Wanderers hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
85/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 76/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Universidad de Chile scoring form 80%
Santiago Wanderers scoring form 80%
Universidad de Chile attack strength 70%
Santiago Wanderers attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Universidad de Chile defense control
Santiago Wanderers defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 40%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Santiago Wanderers have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Long Island Rough Riders
Home
Westchester Flames
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Long Island Rough Riders
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Westchester Flames
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Long Island Rough Riders
Home
Westchester Flames
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Long Island Rough Riders attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Long Island Rough Riders defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Westchester Flames attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Westchester Flames defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Long Island Rough Riders hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Long Island Rough Riders have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Long Island Rough Riders attack stays below 100%
Westchester Flames attack stays below 100%
Long Island Rough Riders Over 2.5 rate limit
Westchester Flames Over 2.5 rate limit
Long Island Rough Riders recent scoring is not high volume
Westchester Flames recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 29
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 43
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Columbus Crew II
Home
Atlanta United II
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.8 (home) and 2.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Columbus Crew II
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Atlanta United II
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Columbus Crew II
Home
Atlanta United II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Columbus Crew II attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Columbus Crew II defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Atlanta United II attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Atlanta United II defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Atlanta United II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Columbus Crew II have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 66% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Atlanta United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Atlanta United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Atlanta United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Atlanta United II strong attack
Atlanta United II scored in last 5
Columbus Crew II concessions at weak rate
Columbus Crew II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sueno FC
Home
St. Croix SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
St. Croix SC have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Sueno FC concede 1.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Sueno FC
At home, they average 4.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
St. Croix SC
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sueno FC
Home
St. Croix SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sueno FC attack is strong at 4.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Sueno FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
St. Croix SC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
St. Croix SC defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Sueno FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 1/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Sueno FC attack strength 100%
St. Croix SC attack strength 100%
Sueno FC scoring form 100%
St. Croix SC scoring form 67%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 83%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Sueno FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Orlando City B
Home
Philadelphia Union II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Orlando City B show the better attacking return at 2.8 goals per game compared with Philadelphia Union II at 0.8, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Orlando City B
At home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Philadelphia Union II
Away from home, they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Orlando City B
Home
Philadelphia Union II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Orlando City B attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Orlando City B defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Philadelphia Union II attack is weak at 0.80 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Philadelphia Union II defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Orlando City B hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 80/100. Orlando City B have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Orlando City B have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
80/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 73/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 80/100. Orlando City B have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Orlando City B strong attack
Orlando City B scored in last 5
Philadelphia Union II concessions at weak rate
Philadelphia Union II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
New York Red Bulls II
Home
Toronto FC II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Toronto FC II have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while New York Red Bulls II concede 2.6 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
New York Red Bulls II
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Toronto FC II
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II
Home
Toronto FC II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
New York Red Bulls II attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
New York Red Bulls II defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Toronto FC II attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Toronto FC II defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Toronto FC II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Toronto FC II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Toronto FC II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Toronto FC II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Toronto FC II strong attack
Toronto FC II scored in last 5
New York Red Bulls II concessions at weak rate
New York Red Bulls II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
New York City FC II
Home
Chattanooga FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output and consistent scoring trends. This creates a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
New York City FC II
At home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Chattanooga FC
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
New York City FC II
Home
Chattanooga FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
New York City FC II attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
New York City FC II defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Chattanooga FC attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Chattanooga FC defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
New York City FC II have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 85% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
New York City FC II attack strength 100%
Chattanooga FC attack strength 100%
New York City FC II scoring form 100%
Chattanooga FC scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 70%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
New York City FC II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Annapolis Blues FC
Home
Nova FC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 4.0 (home) and 3.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Annapolis Blues FC
At home, they average 4.00 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Nova FC
Away from home, they average 3.75 goals scored and 1.75 goals conceded per game.
Annapolis Blues FC
Home
Nova FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Annapolis Blues FC attack is strong at 4.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Annapolis Blues FC defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Nova FC attack is strong at 3.75 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Nova FC defense is weak at 1.75 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Annapolis Blues FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 67% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Annapolis Blues FC attack strength 100%
Nova FC attack strength 100%
Annapolis Blues FC scoring form 67%
Nova FC scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 71%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Nova FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
O'Higgins
Home
Union Espanola
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.2 (home) and 1.6 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
O'Higgins
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Union Espanola
Away from home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
O'Higgins
Home
Union Espanola
Away
Supporting Reasoning
O'Higgins attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
O'Higgins defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Union Espanola attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Union Espanola defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Union Espanola hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 85% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 83/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Selection Score
83/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 76/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 83/100. No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Union Espanola strong attack
Union Espanola scored in last 5
O'Higgins concessions at weak rate
O'Higgins conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
AHFC Royals
Home
San Antonio FC II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
AHFC Royals have the clearer attacking edge at 3.0 goals per game, while San Antonio FC II concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
AHFC Royals
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
San Antonio FC II
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
AHFC Royals
Home
San Antonio FC II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
AHFC Royals attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
AHFC Royals defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
San Antonio FC II attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
San Antonio FC II defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
AHFC Royals hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. AHFC Royals have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5AHFC Royals have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 77/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. AHFC Royals have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
AHFC Royals strong attack
AHFC Royals scored in last 5
San Antonio FC II concessions at weak rate
San Antonio FC II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
West Seattle Junction
Home
Ballard FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
West Seattle Junction average 3.0 goals scored and concede 0.0 per game. Ballard FC average 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
West Seattle Junction
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction
Home
Ballard FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
West Seattle Junction attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
West Seattle Junction defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Ballard FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
West Seattle Junction have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: West Seattle Junction to Win — 92% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. West Seattle Junction show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinWest Seattle Junction show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. West Seattle Junction show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
West Seattle Junction strong attack
West Seattle Junction stable defense
West Seattle Junction non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
West Seattle Junction have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Austin FC II
Home
Sporting Kansas City II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output and consistent scoring trends. This creates a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Austin FC II
At home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Sporting Kansas City II
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Austin FC II
Home
Sporting Kansas City II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Austin FC II attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Austin FC II defense is strong at 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Sporting Kansas City II attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Sporting Kansas City II defense is weak at 2.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Austin FC II have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.4 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 91% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 92/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Austin FC II attack strength 100%
Sporting Kansas City II attack strength 100%
Austin FC II scoring form 100%
Sporting Kansas City II scoring form 80%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 80%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Austin FC II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Albion SC Colorado
Home
CISA
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
CISA have the clearer attacking edge at 2.3 goals per game, while Albion SC Colorado concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Albion SC Colorado
At home, they average 2.67 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
CISA
Away from home, they average 2.33 goals scored and 4.67 goals conceded per game.
Albion SC Colorado
Home
CISA
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Albion SC Colorado attack is strong at 2.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Albion SC Colorado defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
CISA attack is strong at 2.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
CISA defense is weak at 4.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Albion SC Colorado attack strength 100%
CISA attack strength 100%
Albion SC Colorado scoring form 100%
CISA scoring form 67%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 100%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Albion SC Colorado have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Amsg FC
Home
City SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
City SC have the clearer attacking edge at 3.0 goals per game, while Amsg FC concede 2.3 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Amsg FC
At home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
City SC
Away from home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Amsg FC
Home
City SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Amsg FC attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Amsg FC defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
City SC attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
City SC defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
City SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. City SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5City SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
70/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 66/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. City SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
City SC strong attack
City SC scored in last 5
Amsg FC concessions at weak rate
Amsg FC conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Tacoma Defiance
Home
Real Monarchs SLC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Tacoma Defiance
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Real Monarchs SLC
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Tacoma Defiance
Home
Real Monarchs SLC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Tacoma Defiance attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Tacoma Defiance defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Real Monarchs SLC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Real Monarchs SLC defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Real Monarchs SLC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Tacoma Defiance have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. Real Monarchs SLC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Real Monarchs SLC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
70/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 69/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. Real Monarchs SLC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Real Monarchs SLC strong attack
Real Monarchs SLC scored in last 5
Tacoma Defiance concessions at weak rate
Tacoma Defiance conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 2
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 4
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Melbourne Victory Youth
Home
Brunswick City
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Melbourne Victory Youth show the better attacking return at 2.5 goals per game compared with Brunswick City at 1.3, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Melbourne Victory Youth
At home, they average 2.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Brunswick City
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Melbourne Victory Youth
Home
Brunswick City
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Melbourne Victory Youth attack is strong at 2.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Melbourne Victory Youth defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Brunswick City attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Brunswick City defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Melbourne Victory Youth hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 70% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Melbourne Victory Youth have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Melbourne Victory Youth have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 81/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Melbourne Victory Youth have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Melbourne Victory Youth strong attack
Melbourne Victory Youth scored in last 5
Brunswick City concessions at weak rate
Brunswick City conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
AIK
Home
Kalmar FF
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.2 (home) and 1.2 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
AIK
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Kalmar FF
Away from home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
AIK
Home
Kalmar FF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
AIK attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
AIK defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Kalmar FF attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Kalmar FF defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 83% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 74/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 66/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 74/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
AIK scoring form 80%
Kalmar FF scoring form 60%
AIK attack strength 60%
Kalmar FF attack strength 60%
Neither team attack < 70%
AIK defense control
Kalmar FF defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 60%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Merani Martvili
Home
FC Gori
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Merani Martvili average 1.5 goals scored and concede 0.5 per game. FC Gori average 0.3 scored and 1.3 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Merani Martvili
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
FC Gori
Away from home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Merani Martvili
Home
FC Gori
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Merani Martvili attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Merani Martvili defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
FC Gori attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
FC Gori defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Merani Martvili hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Merani Martvili have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Merani Martvili strong attack
Merani Martvili stable defense
Merani Martvili non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 10
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Gareji 1960
Home
Odishi 1919
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.3 (home) and 1.5 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
FC Gareji 1960
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Odishi 1919
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
FC Gareji 1960
Home
Odishi 1919
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Gareji 1960 attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
FC Gareji 1960 defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Odishi 1919 attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Odishi 1919 defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 63% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
65/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Gareji 1960 attack stays below 100%
Odishi 1919 attack stays below 100%
FC Gareji 1960 Over 2.5 rate limit
Odishi 1919 Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Gareji 1960 recent scoring is not high volume
Odishi 1919 recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti
Home
Shturmi
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Shturmi
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti
Home
Shturmi
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Kolkheti-1913 Poti attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Shturmi attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Shturmi defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kolkheti-1913 Poti attack stays below 100%
Shturmi attack stays below 100%
Kolkheti-1913 Poti Over 2.5 rate limit
Shturmi Over 2.5 rate limit
Kolkheti-1913 Poti recent scoring is not high volume
Shturmi recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 10
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 40
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Odds Ballklubb 2
Home
Flekkeroey
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Flekkeroey have the clearer attacking edge at 3.0 goals per game, while Odds Ballklubb 2 concede 2.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Odds Ballklubb 2
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Flekkeroey
Away from home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Odds Ballklubb 2
Home
Flekkeroey
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Odds Ballklubb 2 attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Odds Ballklubb 2 defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Flekkeroey attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Flekkeroey defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Flekkeroey hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Flekkeroey have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Odds Ballklubb 2 scoring form 100%
Flekkeroey scoring form 100%
Odds Ballklubb 2 attack strength 75%
Flekkeroey attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Odds Ballklubb 2 defense control
Flekkeroey defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 75%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Flekkeroey have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
RFS
Home
Ogre United
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
RFS averages 3.5 goals per game while the opponent concedes 1.7 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
RFS
At home, they average 3.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Ogre United
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
RFS
Home
Ogre United
Away
Supporting Reasoning
RFS attack is strong at 3.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
RFS defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Ogre United attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Ogre United defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
RFS hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
RFS have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: RFS to Win — 93% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. RFS show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinRFS show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. RFS show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
RFS strong attack
RFS stable defense
RFS non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
RFS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Riteriai
Home
Hegelmann Litauen
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Riteriai average 0.4 goals scored and concede 2.6 per game. Hegelmann Litauen average 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Riteriai
At home, they average 0.40 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Hegelmann Litauen
Away from home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Riteriai
Home
Hegelmann Litauen
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Riteriai attack is weak at 0.40 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Riteriai defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Hegelmann Litauen attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Hegelmann Litauen defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Hegelmann Litauen hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Hegelmann Litauen have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 74/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 69/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 74/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Hegelmann Litauen strong attack
Hegelmann Litauen stable defense
Hegelmann Litauen non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Haugesund 2
Home
Madla
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.0 (home) and 2.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Haugesund 2
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Madla
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Haugesund 2
Home
Madla
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Haugesund 2 attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Haugesund 2 defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Madla attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Madla defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Haugesund 2 attack strength 100%
Madla attack strength 100%
Haugesund 2 scoring form 100%
Madla scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 100%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Haugesund 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Maardu Linnameeskond
Home
Viimsi JK
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 1.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Maardu Linnameeskond
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Viimsi JK
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Maardu Linnameeskond
Home
Viimsi JK
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Maardu Linnameeskond attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Maardu Linnameeskond defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Viimsi JK attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Viimsi JK defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Viimsi JK have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.6 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 63% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 76/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 76/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Maardu Linnameeskond scoring form 60%
Viimsi JK scoring form 80%
Maardu Linnameeskond attack strength 70%
Viimsi JK attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
Maardu Linnameeskond defense control
Viimsi JK defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 40%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Elva
Home
Flora Tallinn U21
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.0 (home) and 2.2 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
FC Elva
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Flora Tallinn U21
Away from home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
FC Elva
Home
Flora Tallinn U21
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Elva attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
FC Elva defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Flora Tallinn U21 attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Flora Tallinn U21 defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 86% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Flora Tallinn U21 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Flora Tallinn U21 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Flora Tallinn U21 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Flora Tallinn U21 strong attack
Flora Tallinn U21 scored in last 5
FC Elva concessions at weak rate
FC Elva conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 53
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Telavi
Home
Aragvi Dusheti
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
FC Telavi average 1.3 goals scored and concede 0.3 per game. Aragvi Dusheti average 0.5 scored and 1.5 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
FC Telavi
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Aragvi Dusheti
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
FC Telavi
Home
Aragvi Dusheti
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Telavi attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
FC Telavi defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Aragvi Dusheti attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Aragvi Dusheti defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
FC Telavi hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
FC Telavi have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 88/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 87/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 88/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Telavi attack stays below 100%
Aragvi Dusheti attack stays below 100%
FC Telavi Over 2.5 rate limit
Aragvi Dusheti Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Telavi recent scoring is not high volume
Aragvi Dusheti recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Al-Salmiyah
Home
Al Fahaheel
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Al-Salmiyah have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Al Fahaheel concede 2.3 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Al-Salmiyah
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Al Fahaheel
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Al-Salmiyah
Home
Al Fahaheel
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Al-Salmiyah attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Al-Salmiyah defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Al Fahaheel attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Al Fahaheel defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Al-Salmiyah hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Al-Salmiyah have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Al-Salmiyah show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Al-Salmiyah show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Al-Salmiyah show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Al-Salmiyah strong attack
Al-Salmiyah stable defense
Al-Salmiyah non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Torpedo Kutaisi
Home
Spaeri
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Torpedo Kutaisi
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Spaeri
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Torpedo Kutaisi
Home
Spaeri
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Torpedo Kutaisi attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Torpedo Kutaisi defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Spaeri attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Spaeri defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Torpedo Kutaisi hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
83/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Torpedo Kutaisi scoring form 100%
Spaeri scoring form 100%
Torpedo Kutaisi attack strength 75%
Spaeri attack strength 50%
Neither team attack < 70%
Torpedo Kutaisi defense control
Spaeri defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 29
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Bodens BK
Home
IFK Luleaa
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.5 (home) and 2.3 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Bodens BK
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
IFK Luleaa
Away from home, they average 2.33 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Bodens BK
Home
IFK Luleaa
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Bodens BK attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Bodens BK defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
IFK Luleaa attack is strong at 2.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
IFK Luleaa defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
IFK Luleaa hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 67% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Bodens BK scoring form 100%
IFK Luleaa scoring form 100%
Bodens BK attack strength 75%
IFK Luleaa attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Bodens BK defense control
IFK Luleaa defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
IFK Luleaa have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Raeppe GOIF
Home
Haessleholms IF
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Raeppe GOIF
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Haessleholms IF
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Raeppe GOIF
Home
Haessleholms IF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Raeppe GOIF attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Raeppe GOIF defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Haessleholms IF attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Haessleholms IF defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Haessleholms IF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Raeppe GOIF have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 74/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 74/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Raeppe GOIF scoring form 80%
Haessleholms IF scoring form 80%
Raeppe GOIF attack strength 50%
Haessleholms IF attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Raeppe GOIF defense control
Haessleholms IF defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 50%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Haessleholms IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 40
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Landvetter IS
Home
Dalstorps IF
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.0 (home) and 2.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Landvetter IS
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Dalstorps IF
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Landvetter IS
Home
Dalstorps IF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Landvetter IS attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Landvetter IS defense is strong at 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Dalstorps IF attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Dalstorps IF defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Landvetter IS have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.2 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 65% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Landvetter IS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Landvetter IS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 87/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Landvetter IS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Landvetter IS strong attack
Landvetter IS scored in last 5
Dalstorps IF concessions at weak rate
Dalstorps IF conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 51
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Varbergs BoIS FC
Home
Landskrona BoIS
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.8 (home) and 1.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Varbergs BoIS FC
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Landskrona BoIS
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Varbergs BoIS FC
Home
Landskrona BoIS
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Varbergs BoIS FC attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Varbergs BoIS FC defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Landskrona BoIS attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Landskrona BoIS defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
85/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Varbergs BoIS FC scoring form 80%
Landskrona BoIS scoring form 100%
Varbergs BoIS FC attack strength 90%
Landskrona BoIS attack strength 90%
Neither team attack < 70%
Varbergs BoIS FC defense control
Landskrona BoIS defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 40%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 18
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
IK Oddevold
Home
Ljungskile
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.8 (home) and 1.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
IK Oddevold
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Ljungskile
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
IK Oddevold
Home
Ljungskile
Away
Supporting Reasoning
IK Oddevold attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
IK Oddevold defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Ljungskile attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Ljungskile defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
IK Oddevold have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 85% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
IK Oddevold scoring form 100%
Ljungskile scoring form 100%
IK Oddevold attack strength 90%
Ljungskile attack strength 90%
Neither team attack < 70%
IK Oddevold defense control
Ljungskile defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 80%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sioni Bolnisi
Home
Samtredia
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sioni Bolnisi hold the stronger defensive numbers at 0.5 goals conceded per game, while Samtredia allow 2.0. Any edge in this fixture starts from defensive stability.
Sioni Bolnisi
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Samtredia
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sioni Bolnisi
Home
Samtredia
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sioni Bolnisi attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Sioni Bolnisi defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Samtredia attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Samtredia defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Sioni Bolnisi have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.5 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Sioni Bolnisi scoring form 100%
Samtredia scoring form 100%
Sioni Bolnisi attack strength 75%
Samtredia attack strength 67%
Neither team attack < 70%
Sioni Bolnisi defense control
Samtredia defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 75%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Orebro SK
Home
Sandvikens IF
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sandvikens IF have the clearer attacking edge at 2.2 goals per game, while Orebro SK concede 2.2 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Orebro SK
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Sandvikens IF
Away from home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Orebro SK
Home
Sandvikens IF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Orebro SK attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Orebro SK defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Sandvikens IF attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Sandvikens IF defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Sandvikens IF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Sandvikens IF have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sandvikens IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Sandvikens IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sandvikens IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Sandvikens IF strong attack
Sandvikens IF scored in last 5
Orebro SK concessions at weak rate
Orebro SK conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
IK Sleipner
Home
Nykoepings BIS
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Nykoepings BIS have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while IK Sleipner concede 1.7 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
IK Sleipner
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Nykoepings BIS
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
IK Sleipner
Home
Nykoepings BIS
Away
Supporting Reasoning
IK Sleipner attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
IK Sleipner defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Nykoepings BIS attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Nykoepings BIS defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Nykoepings BIS have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.5 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 83/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
IK Sleipner scoring form 100%
Nykoepings BIS scoring form 100%
IK Sleipner attack strength 100%
Nykoepings BIS attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
IK Sleipner defense control
Nykoepings BIS defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 58%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Nykoepings BIS have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 56
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Syrianska
Home
Raegsveds IF
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Raegsveds IF have the clearer attacking edge at 3.5 goals per game, while Syrianska concede 1.7 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Syrianska
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Raegsveds IF
Away from home, they average 3.50 goals scored and 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Syrianska
Home
Raegsveds IF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Syrianska attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Syrianska defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Raegsveds IF attack is strong at 3.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Raegsveds IF defense is weak at 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Raegsveds IF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Syrianska scoring form 67%
Raegsveds IF scoring form 100%
Syrianska attack strength 84%
Raegsveds IF attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Syrianska defense control
Raegsveds IF defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Raegsveds IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kuwait SC
Home
Al-Arabi
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Kuwait SC show the better attacking return at 3.0 goals per game compared with Al-Arabi at 1.5, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Kuwait SC
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Al-Arabi
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Kuwait SC
Home
Al-Arabi
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Kuwait SC attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Kuwait SC defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Al-Arabi attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Al-Arabi defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Kuwait SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 68/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Kuwait SC strong attack
Kuwait SC stable defense
Kuwait SC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
Kuwait SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 20
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Al-Qadsia
Home
Kazma
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Al-Qadsia show the better attacking return at 3.0 goals per game compared with Kazma at 1.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Al-Qadsia
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Kazma
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Al-Qadsia
Home
Kazma
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Al-Qadsia attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Al-Qadsia defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Kazma attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Kazma defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Al-Qadsia hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 72% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 90/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 90/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Al-Qadsia strong attack
Al-Qadsia stable defense
Al-Qadsia non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Al-Qadsia have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
KR Reykjavik
Home
IA Akranes
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
KR Reykjavik average 2.6 goals scored and concede 2.8 per game. IA Akranes average 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
KR Reykjavik
At home, they average 2.60 goals scored and 2.80 goals conceded per game.
IA Akranes
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
KR Reykjavik
Home
IA Akranes
Away
Supporting Reasoning
KR Reykjavik attack is strong at 2.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
KR Reykjavik defense is weak at 2.80 goals conceded per game.
IA Akranes attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
IA Akranes defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
KR Reykjavik hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
IA Akranes have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 87/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
KR Reykjavik scoring form 80%
IA Akranes scoring form 100%
KR Reykjavik attack strength 100%
IA Akranes attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
KR Reykjavik defense control
IA Akranes defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 70%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
KR Reykjavik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
International Tournament
internationalWorld Cup 2026
Uruguay
Home
Cape Verde
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Cape Verde show the better attacking return at 1.8 goals per game compared with Uruguay at 0.6, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Uruguay
At home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Cape Verde
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Uruguay
Home
Cape Verde
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Uruguay attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Uruguay defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Cape Verde attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Cape Verde defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Cape Verde hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 70% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
82/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Cape Verde strong attack
Cape Verde stable defense
Cape Verde non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
New Zealand
Home
Egypt
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Egypt hold the stronger defensive numbers at 0.6 goals conceded per game, while New Zealand allow 2.0. Any edge in this fixture starts from defensive stability.
New Zealand
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Egypt
Away from home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
New Zealand
Home
Egypt
Away
Supporting Reasoning
New Zealand attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
New Zealand defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Egypt attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Egypt defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Egypt have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
77/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
New Zealand attack stays below 100%
Egypt attack stays below 100%
New Zealand Over 2.5 rate limit
Egypt Over 2.5 rate limit
New Zealand recent scoring is not high volume
Egypt recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 4
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Argentina
Home
Austria
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Argentina average 3.0 goals scored and concede 0.2 per game. Austria average 2.2 scored and 0.6 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Argentina
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Austria
Away from home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Argentina
Home
Austria
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Argentina attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Argentina defense is strong at 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Austria attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Austria defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.2 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Away defense is well-organized (avg 0.6 conceded) — this limits the over-goal potential.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 73/100. Argentina have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Argentina have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
73/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 73/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 73/100. Argentina have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Argentina strong attack
Argentina scored in last 5
Austria concessions at weak rate
Austria conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 39
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
3. Divisjon
leagueNorway
Foerde
Home
Aasane 2
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.3 (home) and 1.5 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Foerde
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Aasane 2
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Foerde
Home
Aasane 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Foerde attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Foerde defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Aasane 2 attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Aasane 2 defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 83% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 69/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
69/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 69/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Foerde scoring form 67%
Aasane 2 scoring form 100%
Foerde attack strength 67%
Aasane 2 attack strength 75%
Neither team attack < 70%
Foerde defense control
Aasane 2 defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 58%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Fana
Home
Sogndal 2
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sogndal 2 have the clearer attacking edge at 4.0 goals per game, while Fana concede 2.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Fana
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sogndal 2
Away from home, they average 4.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Fana
Home
Sogndal 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Fana attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Fana defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sogndal 2 attack is strong at 4.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Sogndal 2 defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Sogndal 2 hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 82/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Fana scoring form 100%
Sogndal 2 scoring form 67%
Fana attack strength 75%
Sogndal 2 attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Fana defense control
Sogndal 2 defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 67%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
League of Ireland Premier Division
leagueIreland
Shelbourne
Home
Bohemian FC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.7 (home) and 2.7 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Shelbourne
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Bohemian FC
Away from home, they average 2.67 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Shelbourne
Home
Bohemian FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Shelbourne attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Shelbourne defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Bohemian FC attack is strong at 2.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Bohemian FC defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Bohemian FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Shelbourne have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Shelbourne scoring form 100%
Bohemian FC scoring form 100%
Shelbourne attack strength 84%
Bohemian FC attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Shelbourne defense control
Bohemian FC defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Bohemian FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Shamrock Rovers
Home
Derry City
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Shamrock Rovers
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Derry City
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Shamrock Rovers
Home
Derry City
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Shamrock Rovers attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Shamrock Rovers defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Derry City attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Derry City defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Shamrock Rovers have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 81/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
81/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 68/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 81/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Shamrock Rovers scoring form 100%
Derry City scoring form 100%
Shamrock Rovers attack strength 50%
Derry City attack strength 50%
Neither team attack < 70%
Shamrock Rovers defense control
Derry City defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 75%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 16
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Legend