Match Analysis
Monday 15 June 2026 · AI-driven form analysis
Serie D
leagueBrazil
Araguaina
Home
Galvez EC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Araguaina averages 5.0 goals per game while the opponent concedes 4.3 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Araguaina
At home, they average 5.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Galvez EC
Away from home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 4.33 goals conceded per game.
Araguaina
Home
Galvez EC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Araguaina attack is strong at 5.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Araguaina defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Galvez EC attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Galvez EC defense is weak at 4.33 goals conceded per game.
Araguaina hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Araguaina have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Araguaina to Win — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Araguaina show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinAraguaina show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Araguaina show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Araguaina strong attack
Araguaina stable defense
Araguaina non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Araguaina have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 3
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 10
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Independencia
Home
Guapore
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.0 (home) and 2.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Independencia
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Guapore
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.25 goals conceded per game.
Independencia
Home
Guapore
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Independencia attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Independencia defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Guapore attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Guapore defense is average at 1.25 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 85% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 91/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
91/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 91/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Independencia attack strength 100%
Guapore attack strength 100%
Independencia scoring form 100%
Guapore scoring form 75%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 71%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Independencia have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Porto Velho EC
Home
Humaita SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Porto Velho EC have the clearer attacking edge at 5.0 goals per game, while Humaita SC concede 8.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Porto Velho EC
At home, they average 5.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Humaita SC
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 8.50 goals conceded per game.
Porto Velho EC
Home
Humaita SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Porto Velho EC attack is strong at 5.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Porto Velho EC defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Humaita SC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Humaita SC defense is weak at 8.50 goals conceded per game.
Porto Velho EC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Porto Velho EC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Porto Velho EC strong attack
Porto Velho EC stable defense
Porto Velho EC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Other
leagueUruguay
Paysandu
Home
Plaza Colonia
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Paysandu
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Plaza Colonia
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Paysandu
Home
Plaza Colonia
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Paysandu attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Paysandu defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Plaza Colonia attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Plaza Colonia defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
65/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 65/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Paysandu attack stays below 100%
Plaza Colonia attack stays below 100%
Paysandu Over 2.5 rate limit
Plaza Colonia Over 2.5 rate limit
Paysandu recent scoring is not high volume
Plaza Colonia recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 18
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Win <65
Below 65% by 26
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 32
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Deportivo Merlo
Home
Argentino de Merlo
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Deportivo Merlo
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Argentino de Merlo
Away from home, they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Deportivo Merlo
Home
Argentino de Merlo
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Deportivo Merlo attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Deportivo Merlo defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Argentino de Merlo attack is weak at 0.80 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Argentino de Merlo defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 82% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Deportivo Merlo attack stays below 100%
Argentino de Merlo attack stays below 100%
Deportivo Merlo Over 2.5 rate limit
Argentino de Merlo Over 2.5 rate limit
Deportivo Merlo recent scoring is not high volume
Argentino de Merlo recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 9
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Cincinnati II
Home
Columbus Crew II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
FC Cincinnati II average 0.2 goals scored and concede 2.2 per game. Columbus Crew II average 1.8 scored and 1.2 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
FC Cincinnati II
At home, they average 0.20 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Columbus Crew II
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
FC Cincinnati II
Home
Columbus Crew II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Cincinnati II attack is weak at 0.20 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
FC Cincinnati II defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Columbus Crew II attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Columbus Crew II defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Columbus Crew II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Columbus Crew II have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
82/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Columbus Crew II strong attack
Columbus Crew II stable defense
Columbus Crew II non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 26
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Westchester SC
Home
Greenville Triumph SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Westchester SC averages 3.3 goals per game while the opponent concedes 3.0 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Westchester SC
At home, they average 3.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Greenville Triumph SC
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Westchester SC
Home
Greenville Triumph SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Westchester SC attack is strong at 3.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Westchester SC defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Greenville Triumph SC attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Greenville Triumph SC defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Westchester SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Westchester SC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Westchester SC to Win — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Westchester SC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinWestchester SC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Westchester SC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Westchester SC strong attack
Westchester SC stable defense
Westchester SC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Westchester SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 18
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Bigfoot FC
Home
Oly Town FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Bigfoot FC have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Oly Town FC concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Bigfoot FC
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Oly Town FC
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Bigfoot FC
Home
Oly Town FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Bigfoot FC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Bigfoot FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Oly Town FC attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Oly Town FC defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Bigfoot FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Bigfoot FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Bigfoot FC strong attack
Bigfoot FC stable defense
Bigfoot FC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Bigfoot FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 2
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
RKC Third Coast
Home
Edgewater Castle
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
RKC Third Coast
At home, they average 1.25 goals scored and 0.75 goals conceded per game.
Edgewater Castle
Away from home, they average 0.75 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
RKC Third Coast
Home
Edgewater Castle
Away
Supporting Reasoning
RKC Third Coast attack is average at 1.25 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
RKC Third Coast defense is strong at 0.75 goals conceded per game.
Edgewater Castle attack is weak at 0.75 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Edgewater Castle defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
RKC Third Coast hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
RKC Third Coast have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: RKC Third Coast to Win — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 68/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
WinNo team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
68/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 65/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 68/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
RKC Third Coast strong attack
RKC Third Coast stable defense
RKC Third Coast non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
The Villages SC
Home
Nona FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
The Villages SC average 1.0 goals scored and concede 0.5 per game. Nona FC average 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
The Villages SC
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Nona FC
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
The Villages SC
Home
Nona FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
The Villages SC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
The Villages SC defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Nona FC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Nona FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Nona FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
The Villages SC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 76/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Nona FC strong attack
Nona FC stable defense
Nona FC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Nona FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
City SC
Home
Ventura County Fusion
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Ventura County Fusion have the clearer attacking edge at 2.8 goals per game, while City SC concede 1.7 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
City SC
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Ventura County Fusion
Away from home, they average 2.75 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
City SC
Home
Ventura County Fusion
Away
Supporting Reasoning
City SC attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
City SC defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Ventura County Fusion attack is strong at 2.75 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Ventura County Fusion defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Ventura County Fusion hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Ventura County Fusion have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
City SC scoring form 100%
Ventura County Fusion scoring form 100%
City SC attack strength 84%
Ventura County Fusion attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
City SC defense control
Ventura County Fusion defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 88%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Ventura County Fusion have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Snohomish United
Home
West Seattle Junction
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Snohomish United average 3.2 goals scored and concede 0.6 per game. West Seattle Junction average 1.5 scored and 2.3 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Snohomish United
At home, they average 3.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.25 goals conceded per game.
Snohomish United
Home
West Seattle Junction
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Snohomish United attack is strong at 3.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Snohomish United defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
West Seattle Junction defense is weak at 2.25 goals conceded per game.
Snohomish United hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Snohomish United have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.6 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Snohomish United have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Snohomish United have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Win · 91/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Snohomish United have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Snohomish United strong attack
Snohomish United scored in last 5
West Seattle Junction concessions at weak rate
West Seattle Junction conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Bangers FC
Home
Ballard FC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Bangers FC
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Bangers FC
Home
Ballard FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Bangers FC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Bangers FC defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Ballard FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Bangers FC attack stays below 100%
Ballard FC attack stays below 100%
Bangers FC Over 2.5 rate limit
Ballard FC Over 2.5 rate limit
Bangers FC recent scoring is not high volume
Ballard FC recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 14
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kinondoni MC
Home
Coastal Union
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Coastal Union averages 2.5 goals per game while the opponent concedes 1.7 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Kinondoni MC
At home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Coastal Union
Away from home, they average 2.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Kinondoni MC
Home
Coastal Union
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Kinondoni MC attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Kinondoni MC defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Coastal Union attack is strong at 2.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Coastal Union defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Coastal Union hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Coastal Union have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Coastal Union to Win — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Coastal Union show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinCoastal Union show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Coastal Union show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Coastal Union strong attack
Coastal Union stable defense
Coastal Union non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Coastal Union have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 10
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Havadar SC
Home
Mes Kerman
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Havadar SC
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Mes Kerman
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Havadar SC
Home
Mes Kerman
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Havadar SC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Havadar SC defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Mes Kerman attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Mes Kerman defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 82% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Havadar SC attack stays below 100%
Mes Kerman attack stays below 100%
Havadar SC Over 2.5 rate limit
Mes Kerman Over 2.5 rate limit
Havadar SC recent scoring is not high volume
Mes Kerman recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 22
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 45
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 50
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Fard
Home
Sanat Naft Abadan
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
FC Fard
At home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Sanat Naft Abadan
Away from home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
FC Fard
Home
Sanat Naft Abadan
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Fard attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
FC Fard defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Sanat Naft Abadan attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Sanat Naft Abadan defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Fard attack stays below 100%
Sanat Naft Abadan attack stays below 100%
FC Fard Over 2.5 rate limit
Sanat Naft Abadan Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Fard recent scoring is not high volume
Sanat Naft Abadan recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 23
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Mes Shahr Babak
Home
Beasat Kermanshah
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Weak attacking output from both sides — neither team averages more than 1.2 goals per game. Limited goal threat across the board.
Mes Shahr Babak
At home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Beasat Kermanshah
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Mes Shahr Babak
Home
Beasat Kermanshah
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Mes Shahr Babak attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Mes Shahr Babak defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Beasat Kermanshah attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Beasat Kermanshah defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Weak attacking teams are unpredictable — form can suddenly improve or the sample window may be small.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Win · 77/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Mes Shahr Babak attack stays below 100%
Beasat Kermanshah attack stays below 100%
Mes Shahr Babak Over 2.5 rate limit
Beasat Kermanshah Over 2.5 rate limit
Mes Shahr Babak recent scoring is not high volume
Beasat Kermanshah recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 52
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 56
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Mes Sungun
Home
Nassaji Mazandaran FC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.3 (home) and 1.5 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Mes Sungun
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Nassaji Mazandaran FC
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Mes Sungun
Home
Nassaji Mazandaran FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Mes Sungun attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Mes Sungun defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Nassaji Mazandaran FC attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Nassaji Mazandaran FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.67 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 63% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Mes Sungun scoring form 100%
Nassaji Mazandaran FC scoring form 100%
Mes Sungun attack strength 67%
Nassaji Mazandaran FC attack strength 75%
Neither team attack < 70%
Mes Sungun defense control
Nassaji Mazandaran FC defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 23
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
SJK Akatemia
Home
FC Haka J
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
SJK Akatemia average 0.0 goals scored and concede 1.8 per game. FC Haka J average 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
SJK Akatemia
At home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
FC Haka J
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
SJK Akatemia
Home
FC Haka J
Away
Supporting Reasoning
SJK Akatemia attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
SJK Akatemia defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
FC Haka J attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
FC Haka J defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
FC Haka J hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
FC Haka J have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 67/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
SJK Akatemia attack stays below 100%
FC Haka J attack stays below 100%
SJK Akatemia Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Haka J Over 2.5 rate limit
SJK Akatemia recent scoring is not high volume
FC Haka J recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Fram Larvik
Home
Lyn 2
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.5 (home) and 2.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Fram Larvik
At home, they average 2.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Lyn 2
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Fram Larvik
Home
Lyn 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Fram Larvik attack is strong at 2.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Fram Larvik defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Lyn 2 attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Lyn 2 defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Fram Larvik have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 1/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
77/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 76/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 77/100. Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Fram Larvik attack strength 100%
Lyn 2 attack strength 100%
Fram Larvik scoring form 50%
Lyn 2 scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 50%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Lyn 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 44
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Staal Joerpeland
Home
Odds Ballklubb 2
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.3 (home) and 1.7 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Staal Joerpeland
At home, they average 2.33 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Odds Ballklubb 2
Away from home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Staal Joerpeland
Home
Odds Ballklubb 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Staal Joerpeland attack is strong at 2.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Staal Joerpeland defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Odds Ballklubb 2 attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Odds Ballklubb 2 defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Staal Joerpeland hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 88/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Staal Joerpeland scoring form 100%
Odds Ballklubb 2 scoring form 100%
Staal Joerpeland attack strength 100%
Odds Ballklubb 2 attack strength 84%
Neither team attack < 70%
Staal Joerpeland defense control
Odds Ballklubb 2 defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Staal Joerpeland have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr
Home
Saipa
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr
At home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Saipa
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr
Home
Saipa
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Saipa attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Saipa defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Saipa hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 88/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 88/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr attack stays below 100%
Saipa attack stays below 100%
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr Over 2.5 rate limit
Saipa Over 2.5 rate limit
Pars Jonoubi Jam Bushehr recent scoring is not high volume
Saipa recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 41
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 43
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 43
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Naft Gachsaran
Home
Niroye Zamini
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Naft Gachsaran
At home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Niroye Zamini
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Naft Gachsaran
Home
Niroye Zamini
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Naft Gachsaran attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Naft Gachsaran defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Niroye Zamini attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Niroye Zamini defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Niroye Zamini have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Naft Gachsaran attack stays below 100%
Niroye Zamini attack stays below 100%
Naft Gachsaran Over 2.5 rate limit
Niroye Zamini Over 2.5 rate limit
Naft Gachsaran recent scoring is not high volume
Niroye Zamini recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 36
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 41
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Nomme Kalju U21
Home
Nomme United U21
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.8 (home) and 1.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Nomme Kalju U21
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Nomme United U21
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Nomme Kalju U21
Home
Nomme United U21
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Nomme Kalju U21 attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Nomme Kalju U21 defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Nomme United U21 attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Nomme United U21 defense is weak at 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 88% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Nomme Kalju U21 scoring form 100%
Nomme United U21 scoring form 100%
Nomme Kalju U21 attack strength 90%
Nomme United U21 attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
Nomme Kalju U21 defense control
Nomme United U21 defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 90%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 29
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
GIF Sundsvall
Home
Oesters IF
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Oesters IF have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while GIF Sundsvall concede 1.8 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
GIF Sundsvall
At home, they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Oesters IF
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
GIF Sundsvall
Home
Oesters IF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
GIF Sundsvall attack is weak at 0.60 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
GIF Sundsvall defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Oesters IF attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Oesters IF defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Oesters IF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Oesters IF have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Oesters IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Oesters IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 75/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Oesters IF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Oesters IF strong attack
Oesters IF scored in last 5
GIF Sundsvall concessions at weak rate
GIF Sundsvall conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 9
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Ranheim 2
Home
Kvik
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.7 (home) and 2.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Ranheim 2
At home, they average 2.67 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Kvik
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Ranheim 2
Home
Kvik
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ranheim 2 attack is strong at 2.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Ranheim 2 defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Kvik attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Kvik defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Ranheim 2 scoring form 100%
Kvik scoring form 100%
Ranheim 2 attack strength 100%
Kvik attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Ranheim 2 defense control
Kvik defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Ranheim 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 56
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
IFK Norrkoeping
Home
Varbergs BoIS FC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.6 (home) and 1.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
IFK Norrkoeping
At home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Varbergs BoIS FC
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
IFK Norrkoeping
Home
Varbergs BoIS FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
IFK Norrkoeping attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
IFK Norrkoeping defense is strong at 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Varbergs BoIS FC attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Varbergs BoIS FC defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 62% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 69/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
IFK Norrkoeping attack stays below 100%
Varbergs BoIS FC attack stays below 100%
IFK Norrkoeping Over 2.5 rate limit
Varbergs BoIS FC Over 2.5 rate limit
IFK Norrkoeping recent scoring is not high volume
Varbergs BoIS FC recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Nykoepings BIS
Home
Smedby AIS
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Nykoepings BIS
At home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Smedby AIS
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Nykoepings BIS
Home
Smedby AIS
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Nykoepings BIS attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Nykoepings BIS defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Smedby AIS attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Smedby AIS defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Smedby AIS hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Nykoepings BIS attack stays below 100%
Smedby AIS attack stays below 100%
Nykoepings BIS Over 2.5 rate limit
Smedby AIS Over 2.5 rate limit
Nykoepings BIS recent scoring is not high volume
Smedby AIS recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 14
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Vaenersborgs IF
Home
Herrestads AIF
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Herrestads AIF have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Vaenersborgs IF concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Vaenersborgs IF
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Herrestads AIF
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Vaenersborgs IF
Home
Herrestads AIF
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Vaenersborgs IF attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Vaenersborgs IF defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Herrestads AIF attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Herrestads AIF defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Herrestads AIF hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Herrestads AIF have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 75% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Herrestads AIF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Herrestads AIF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 82/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Herrestads AIF have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Herrestads AIF strong attack
Herrestads AIF scored in last 5
Vaenersborgs IF concessions at weak rate
Vaenersborgs IF conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Umeaa FC Akademi
Home
IFK Umeaa
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Umeaa FC Akademi average 1.7 goals scored and concede 2.3 per game. IFK Umeaa average 1.3 scored and 4.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Umeaa FC Akademi
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
IFK Umeaa
Away from home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Umeaa FC Akademi
Home
IFK Umeaa
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Umeaa FC Akademi attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Umeaa FC Akademi defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
IFK Umeaa attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
IFK Umeaa defense is weak at 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 78/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
78/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 73/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 78/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Umeaa FC Akademi scoring form 100%
IFK Umeaa scoring form 67%
Umeaa FC Akademi attack strength 84%
IFK Umeaa attack strength 67%
Neither team attack < 70%
Umeaa FC Akademi defense control
IFK Umeaa defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 4
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
KA Akureyri
Home
Fram Reykjavik
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Fram Reykjavik have the clearer attacking edge at 2.8 goals per game, while KA Akureyri concede 2.6 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
KA Akureyri
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Fram Reykjavik
Away from home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
KA Akureyri
Home
Fram Reykjavik
Away
Supporting Reasoning
KA Akureyri attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
KA Akureyri defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Fram Reykjavik attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Fram Reykjavik defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Fram Reykjavik hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Fram Reykjavik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Fram Reykjavik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Fram Reykjavik have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Fram Reykjavik strong attack
Fram Reykjavik scored in last 5
KA Akureyri concessions at weak rate
KA Akureyri conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sportivo Barracas
Home
General Lamadrid
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Sportivo Barracas
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
General Lamadrid
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Sportivo Barracas
Home
General Lamadrid
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sportivo Barracas attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Sportivo Barracas defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
General Lamadrid attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
General Lamadrid defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 66/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sportivo Barracas attack stays below 100%
General Lamadrid attack stays below 100%
Sportivo Barracas Over 2.5 rate limit
General Lamadrid Over 2.5 rate limit
Sportivo Barracas recent scoring is not high volume
General Lamadrid recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Win <65
Below 65% by 1
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sacachispas FC
Home
Argentino de Rosario
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Sacachispas FC
At home, they average 0.40 goals scored and 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Argentino de Rosario
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Sacachispas FC
Home
Argentino de Rosario
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sacachispas FC attack is weak at 0.40 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Sacachispas FC defense is strong at 0.20 goals conceded per game.
Argentino de Rosario attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Argentino de Rosario defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Sacachispas FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Win · 71/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 90/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Sacachispas FC attack stays below 100%
Argentino de Rosario attack stays below 100%
Sacachispas FC Over 2.5 rate limit
Argentino de Rosario Over 2.5 rate limit
Sacachispas FC recent scoring is not high volume
Argentino de Rosario recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 36
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 39
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Defensores de Cambaceres
Home
Berazategui
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Defensores de Cambaceres
At home, they average 0.40 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Berazategui
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Defensores de Cambaceres
Home
Berazategui
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Defensores de Cambaceres attack is weak at 0.40 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Defensores de Cambaceres defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Berazategui attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Berazategui defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Win · 76/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Defensores de Cambaceres attack stays below 100%
Berazategui attack stays below 100%
Defensores de Cambaceres Over 2.5 rate limit
Berazategui Over 2.5 rate limit
Defensores de Cambaceres recent scoring is not high volume
Berazategui recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 12
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 39
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
CA Fenix
Home
Leones de Rosario
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Leones de Rosario show the better attacking return at 1.4 goals per game compared with CA Fenix at 0.2, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
CA Fenix
At home, they average 0.20 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Leones de Rosario
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
CA Fenix
Home
Leones de Rosario
Away
Supporting Reasoning
CA Fenix attack is weak at 0.20 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
CA Fenix defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Leones de Rosario attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Leones de Rosario defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Leones de Rosario hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 78/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
78/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 78/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Leones de Rosario strong attack
Leones de Rosario stable defense
Leones de Rosario non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 34
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
UMF Selfoss
Home
Throttur Vogum
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
UMF Selfoss have the clearer attacking edge at 2.4 goals per game, while Throttur Vogum concede 2.2 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
UMF Selfoss
At home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Throttur Vogum
Away from home, they average 0.80 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
UMF Selfoss
Home
Throttur Vogum
Away
Supporting Reasoning
UMF Selfoss attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
UMF Selfoss defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Throttur Vogum attack is weak at 0.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Throttur Vogum defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
UMF Selfoss hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 72% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. UMF Selfoss have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5UMF Selfoss have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. UMF Selfoss have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
UMF Selfoss strong attack
UMF Selfoss scored in last 5
Throttur Vogum concessions at weak rate
Throttur Vogum conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Fjoelnir
Home
Kari
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Kari have the clearer attacking edge at 3.4 goals per game, while Fjoelnir concede 2.4 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Fjoelnir
At home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Kari
Away from home, they average 3.40 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Fjoelnir
Home
Kari
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Fjoelnir attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Fjoelnir defense is weak at 2.40 goals conceded per game.
Kari attack is strong at 3.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Kari defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 92/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Fjoelnir attack strength 100%
Kari attack strength 100%
Fjoelnir scoring form 100%
Kari scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 90%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Fjoelnir have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Primera Division
leagueChile
Universidad Catolica
Home
Universidad de Concepcion
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Universidad de Concepcion have the clearer attacking edge at 1.3 goals per game, while Universidad Catolica concede 1.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Universidad Catolica
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Universidad de Concepcion
Away from home, they average 1.25 goals scored and 2.25 goals conceded per game.
Universidad Catolica
Home
Universidad de Concepcion
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Universidad Catolica attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Universidad Catolica defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Universidad de Concepcion attack is average at 1.25 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Universidad de Concepcion defense is weak at 2.25 goals conceded per game.
Universidad Catolica hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Universidad Catolica have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 73% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Universidad Catolica attack strength 100%
Universidad de Concepcion attack strength 63%
Universidad Catolica scoring form 100%
Universidad de Concepcion scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 88%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Universidad Catolica have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie B
leagueBrazil
Botafogo SP
Home
Operario Ferroviario
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.5 (home) and 1.5 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Botafogo SP
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Operario Ferroviario
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Botafogo SP
Home
Operario Ferroviario
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Botafogo SP attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Botafogo SP defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Operario Ferroviario attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Operario Ferroviario defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Botafogo SP scoring form 100%
Operario Ferroviario scoring form 100%
Botafogo SP attack strength 75%
Operario Ferroviario attack strength 75%
Neither team attack < 70%
Botafogo SP defense control
Operario Ferroviario defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 42
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Novorizontino
Home
Nautico
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Nautico have the clearer attacking edge at 1.7 goals per game, while Novorizontino concede 1.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Novorizontino
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Nautico
Away from home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Novorizontino
Home
Nautico
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Novorizontino attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Novorizontino defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Nautico attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Nautico defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Novorizontino have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 68% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 88/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Novorizontino scoring form 100%
Nautico scoring form 67%
Novorizontino attack strength 100%
Nautico attack strength 84%
Neither team attack < 70%
Novorizontino defense control
Nautico defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Novorizontino have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie C
leagueBrazil
Volta Redonda
Home
Confianca
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Volta Redonda average 1.5 goals scored and concede 0.5 per game. Confianca average 0.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Volta Redonda
At home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Confianca
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Volta Redonda
Home
Confianca
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Volta Redonda attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Volta Redonda defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Confianca attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Confianca defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Volta Redonda hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Volta Redonda have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Volta Redonda strong attack
Volta Redonda stable defense
Volta Redonda non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 20
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 36
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Floresta
Home
Figueirense
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Floresta
At home, they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Figueirense
Away from home, they average 0.67 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Floresta
Home
Figueirense
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Floresta attack is average at 1.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Floresta defense is average at 1.33 goals conceded per game.
Figueirense attack is weak at 0.67 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Figueirense defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Floresta hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Figueirense have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 67/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
67/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 67/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Floresta attack stays below 100%
Figueirense attack stays below 100%
Floresta Over 2.5 rate limit
Figueirense Over 2.5 rate limit
Floresta recent scoring is not high volume
Figueirense recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 20
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 27
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
International Tournament
internationalWorld Cup 2026
Ivory Coast
Home
Ecuador
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.8 (home) and 1.2 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Ivory Coast
At home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Ecuador
Away from home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Ivory Coast
Home
Ecuador
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ivory Coast attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Ivory Coast defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Ecuador attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Ecuador defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Ivory Coast hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 75/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
75/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 65/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 75/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Ivory Coast strong attack
Ivory Coast stable defense
Ivory Coast non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Sweden
Home
Tunisia
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Sweden have the clearer attacking edge at 2.4 goals per game, while Tunisia concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Sweden
At home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Tunisia
Away from home, they average 0.20 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Sweden
Home
Tunisia
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Sweden attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Sweden defense is weak at 2.60 goals conceded per game.
Tunisia attack is weak at 0.20 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Tunisia defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Sweden hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sweden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Sweden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 75/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Sweden have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Sweden strong attack
Sweden scored in last 5
Tunisia concessions at weak rate
Tunisia conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 2
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Spain
Home
Cape Verde
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 1.8 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Spain
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Cape Verde
Away from home, they average 1.80 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Spain
Home
Cape Verde
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Spain attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Spain defense is strong at 0.40 goals conceded per game.
Cape Verde attack is average at 1.80 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Cape Verde defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Spain have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.4 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 64% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 76/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 65/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 76/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Spain scoring form 60%
Cape Verde scoring form 80%
Spain attack strength 70%
Cape Verde attack strength 90%
Neither team attack < 70%
Spain defense control
Cape Verde defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 40%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Belgium
Home
Egypt
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Belgium show the better attacking return at 2.8 goals per game compared with Egypt at 1.2, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
Belgium
At home, they average 2.80 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Egypt
Away from home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Belgium
Home
Egypt
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Belgium attack is strong at 2.80 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Belgium defense is strong at 0.80 goals conceded per game.
Egypt attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Egypt defense is strong at 0.60 goals conceded per game.
Belgium hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 74% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
82/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 66/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 82/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Belgium strong attack
Belgium stable defense
Belgium non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 6
Belgium have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
3. Divisjon
leagueNorway
Aasane 2
Home
Stord
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.3 (home) and 1.5 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Aasane 2
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Stord
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Aasane 2
Home
Stord
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Aasane 2 attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Aasane 2 defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
Stord attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Stord defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 78/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
78/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 72/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 78/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Aasane 2 scoring form 67%
Stord scoring form 100%
Aasane 2 attack strength 67%
Stord attack strength 75%
Neither team attack < 70%
Aasane 2 defense control
Stord defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 83%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 5
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 25
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Kongsvinger 2
Home
Skjetten
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.7 (home) and 3.0 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Kongsvinger 2
At home, they average 2.67 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Skjetten
Away from home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Kongsvinger 2
Home
Skjetten
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Kongsvinger 2 attack is strong at 2.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Kongsvinger 2 defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Skjetten attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Skjetten defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 90% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Kongsvinger 2 attack strength 100%
Skjetten attack strength 100%
Kongsvinger 2 scoring form 100%
Skjetten scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 100%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Kongsvinger 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Legend